Created on 2012-07-23.00:00:00 last changed 90 months ago
[Moved to DR at the April, 2013 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (October, 2012):
Change 126.96.36.199 [dcl.type.cv] paragraph 1 as follows:
There are two cv-qualifiers, const and volatile. If a cv-qualifier appears in a decl-specifier-seq, the init-declarator-list of the declaration shall not be empty. [Note:...
There is no restriction against repeated cv-qualifiers in declarators, although there is (in 9.2.9 [dcl.type] paragraph 2) for those appearing in a decl-specifier-seq. However, most or all current implementations reject such code. Is a change needed?
|2014-03-03 00:00:00||admin||set||status: drwp -> cd3|
|2013-10-14 00:00:00||admin||set||status: dr -> drwp|
|2013-05-03 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg4405|
|2013-05-03 00:00:00||admin||set||status: ready -> dr|
|2012-11-03 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg4061|
|2012-11-03 00:00:00||admin||set||status: open -> ready|