Created on 2012-06-22.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Moved to DR status at the April, 2013 meeting as paper N3624.]
Proposed resolution (November, 2012):
The proposed wording is found in document N3478.
(This resolution also resolves issue 583.)
According to 7.6.9 [expr.rel] paragraph 2, describing pointer comparisons,
Pointer conversions (7.3.12 [conv.ptr]) and qualification conversions (7.3.6 [conv.qual]) are performed on pointer operands (or on a pointer operand and a null pointer constant, or on two null pointer constants, at least one of which is non-integral) to bring them to their composite pointer type.
This would appear to make the following example ill-formed,
bool foo(int** x, const int** y) {
return x < y; // valid ?
}
because int** cannot be converted to const int**, according to the rules of 7.3.6 [conv.qual] paragraph 4. This seems too strict for pointer comparison, and current implementations accept the example.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd3 |
2013-10-14 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
2013-05-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4388 |
2013-05-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> dr |
2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4083 |
2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> review |
2012-06-22 00:00:00 | admin | create |