Created on 2012-03-20.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Moved to DR at the April, 2013 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (August, 2012):
Change 12.4.7 [over.inc] paragraph 1 as follows:
The user-defined function called operator++ implements the prefix and postfix ++ operator. If this function is a member function with no parameters, or a non-member function with one parameterof class or enumeration type, it defines the prefix increment operator ++ for objects of that type. If the function...
The phrase in 12.4.7 [over.inc] paragraph 1,
a non-member function with one parameter of class or enumeration type
inadvertently excludes reference parameters, and in fact, no mention of the type is necessary in light of 12.4 [over.oper] paragraph 6:
An operator function shall either be a non-static member function or be a non-member function and have at least one parameter whose type is a class, a reference to a class, an enumeration, or a reference to an enumeration.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd3 |
| 2013-10-14 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
| 2013-05-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4422 |
| 2013-05-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: tentatively ready -> ready |
| 2012-09-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3884 |
| 2012-03-20 00:00:00 | admin | create | |