Created on 2011-08-19.00:00:00 last changed 87 months ago
Rationale (April, 2013):
CWG felt that this suggested use of alias templates should be considered in a broader context and thus was more appropriate for EWG.
Additional note, April, 2013:
It was suggested that relaxing this restriction for alias templates could provide a way of addressing the long-standing lack of a way of specifying a language linkage for a dependent function type (see issue 13).
Currently 17 [temp] paragraph 4 forbids any template from having C linkage. Should alias templates be exempt from this prohibition, since they do not have any linkage?
|2013-05-03 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg4448|
|2013-05-03 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg4447|
|2013-05-03 00:00:00||admin||set||status: open -> extension|