- Title
- Volatile members in literal classes?
- Status
- cd3
- Section
- 6.9 [basic.types]
- Submitter
- Richard Smith
Created on 2012-01-02.00:00:00 last changed 142 months ago
Messages
Date: 2012-10-15.00:00:00
[Moved to DR at the October, 2012 meeting.]
Date: 2012-02-15.00:00:00
Proposed resolution (February, 2012):
Change 6.9 [basic.types] paragraph 10 as follows:
A type is a literal type if it is:
...
a class type (Clause 11 [class]) that has all the following properties:
...
all of its non-static data members and base classes are of non-volatile literal types.
Date: 2012-01-02.00:00:00
Can a literal class have a volatile member? For example,
struct S {
constexpr S() : n(0) { }
volatile int n;
};
constexpr S s; // causes volatile write to S::n
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd3 |
| 2013-05-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4120 |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3692 |
| 2012-01-02 00:00:00 | admin | create | |