Created on 2012-01-05.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Moved to DR at the October, 2012 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (February, 2012):
Add the following immediately after the grammar in _N4567_.5.1.1 [expr.prim.general] paragraph 8 and move the text following that point into a new paragraph:
The type denoted by a decltype-specifier in a nested-name-specifier shall be a class or enumeration type.
A nested-name-specifier that denotes a class...
The current wording of the Standard does not describe what happens when a decltype-specifier is used as a nested-name-specifier and the type denoted by the decltype-specifier is neither a class type nor an enumeration type. Such nested-name-specifiers should be prohibited, presumably somewhere around paragraphs 8-10 of _N4567_.5.1.1 [expr.prim.general]. (The corresponding prohibition for named types is handled as part of lookup in 6.5.5 [basic.lookup.qual] paragraph 1.)
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd3 |
| 2013-05-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4127 |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3697 |
| 2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> ready |
| 2012-01-05 00:00:00 | admin | create | |