Created on 2011-08-17.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the February, 2012 meeting; moved to DR at the October, 2012 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (August, 2011):
Change 9.2.6 [dcl.constexpr] paragraph 4 as follows:
In aThe definition of a constexpr constructor, each of the parameter types shall be a literal type. In addition, either its function-body shall be = delete or = default or itshall satisfy the following constraints:
the class shall not have any virtual base classes;
each of the parameter types shall be a literal type;
its function-body shall not be a function-try-block;
In addition, either its function-body shall be = delete or it shall satisfy the following constraints:
either its function-body shall be = default or the compound-statement of its function-body shall contain only...
The requirement that a class with a constexpr constructor cannot have a virtual base only applies to constructors with non-deleted and non-defaulted function-bodys. This seems like an oversight.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd3 |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
| 2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3800 |
| 2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2011-09-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3449 |
| 2011-08-17 00:00:00 | admin | create | |