Created on 2010-08-31.00:00:00 last changed 141 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the March, 2011 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (November, 2010):
Change the comments in the example in 6.10.3.2 [basic.start.static] paragraph 3 as follows:
inline double fd() { return 1.0; }
extern double d1;
double d2 = d1; // unspecified:
// may be statically initialized to 0.0 or
// dynamically initialized to 1.0 to 0.0 if d1 is dynamically initialized, or 1.0 otherwise
double d1 = fd(); // may be initialized statically or dynamically to 1.0
(The note should also be in running text following the bulleted list instead of appearing as a bulleted item, as well.)
The note in 6.10.3.2 [basic.start.static] paragraph 3 contains the following example:
inline double fd() { return 1.0; }
extern double d1;
double d2 = d1; // unspecified:
// may be statically initialized to 0.0 or
// dynamically initialized to 1.0
double d1 = fd(); // may be initialized statically to 1.0
The comment for d2 overlooks the third possibility: if both d1 and d2 are dynamically initialized, d2 will be initialized to 0.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: fdis -> c++11 |
| 2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3297 |
| 2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> fdis |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3047 |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> ready |
| 2010-08-31 00:00:00 | admin | create | |