Created on 2010-08-03.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the March, 2011 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (November, 2010):
This issue is resolved by the resolution of issue 1135.
Rationale (August, 2010):
The consensus of the CWG was that this change should not be made at this point in the standardization process, but that it might be considered at a later date.
A class with a non-public explicitly-defaulted copy constructor isn't ever trivially copyable under the current rules. If such a class is used as a subobject, the copy constructor of the aggregating class should be trivial if it can access the non-public explicitly defaulted copy constructor of a subobject.
See also issue 1145.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: fdis -> c++11 |
| 2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3371 |
| 2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> fdis |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3061 |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: extension -> ready |
| 2010-08-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2967 |
| 2010-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | create | |