Created on 2010-08-03.00:00:00 last changed 96 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the March, 2011 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (November, 2010):
This issue is resolved by the resolution of issue 1135.
Rationale (August, 2010):
The consensus of the CWG was that this change should not be made at this point in the standardization process, but that it might be considered at a later date.
A class with a non-public explicitly-defaulted copy constructor isn't ever trivially copyable under the current rules. If such a class is used as a subobject, the copy constructor of the aggregating class should be trivial if it can access the non-public explicitly defaulted copy constructor of a subobject.
See also issue 1145.
|2014-03-03 00:00:00||admin||set||status: fdis -> c++11|
|2011-04-10 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg3371|
|2011-04-10 00:00:00||admin||set||status: ready -> fdis|
|2010-11-29 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg3061|
|2010-11-29 00:00:00||admin||set||status: extension -> ready|
|2010-08-23 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg2967|