Created on 2010-08-02.00:00:00 last changed 128 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the November, 2010 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (September, 2010):
Change 6.9.1 [intro.execution] paragraph 4 as follows:
Certain other operations are described in this International Standard as undefined (for example, the effect ofdereferencing the null pointerattempting to modify a const object). [Note:...
There are core issues surrounding the undefined behavior of dereferencing a null pointer. It appears the intent is that dereferencing is well defined, but using the result of the dereference will yield undefined behavior. This topic is too confused to be the reference example of undefined behavior, or should be stated more precisely if it is to be retained.
(See also issue 232.)
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: fdis -> c++11 |
2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> fdis |
2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3138 |
2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: tentatively ready -> dr |
2010-10-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2968 |
2010-10-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> tentatively ready |
2010-08-02 00:00:00 | admin | create |