Created on 2010-06-22.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the November, 2010 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (September, 2010):
Change 7.6.1.3 [expr.call] paragraph 7 as follows:
...Passing a potentially-evaluated argument of class type ( Clause 11 [class])withhaving a non-trivial copy constructor, a non-trivial move constructor, or a non-trivial destructor, with no corresponding parameter is conditionally-supported,with implementation-defined semantics. If the argument...
7.6.1.3 [expr.call] paragraph 7 should mention a non-trivial move constructor as well, for consistency with “trivially copyable.”
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: fdis -> c++11 |
| 2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> fdis |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3152 |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: tentatively ready -> dr |
| 2010-10-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2973 |
| 2010-10-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> tentatively ready |
| 2010-06-22 00:00:00 | admin | create | |