Created on 2010-03-23.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the November, 2010 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (August, 2010):
This issue is resolved by the resolution of issue 1051.
The new wording in 11.4.5.3 [class.copy.ctor] specifies the behavior of an implicitly-defined copy constructor for a non-union class (paragraph 16), an implicitly-defined move constructor for a non-union class (paragraph 17), and an implicitly-defined copy constructor for a union (paragraph 18), but not an implicitly-defined move constructor for a union.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: fdis -> c++11 |
| 2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> fdis |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3188 |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: tentatively ready -> dr |
| 2010-10-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> tentatively ready |
| 2010-08-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2796 |
| 2010-08-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> ready |
| 2010-03-23 00:00:00 | admin | create | |