Created on 2010-02-10.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the March, 2011 meeting as part of paper N3262.]
Proposed resolution (February, 2011) [SUPERSEDED]:
Change the grammar of 9.12.1 [dcl.attr.grammar] paragraph 1 as follows:
An attribute-argument-clause should be allowed to consist solely of (), i.e., with no balanced-token-seq. Furthermore, the grammar for balanced-token should make the balanced-token-seq optional. Both of these goals could be accomplished by making the balanced-token optional in the first production of the rule for balanced-token-seq.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: fdis -> c++11 |
| 2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3336 |
| 2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> fdis |
| 2011-02-28 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3242 |
| 2011-02-28 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> review |
| 2010-08-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> drafting |
| 2010-02-10 00:00:00 | admin | create | |