Created on 2010-01-12.00:00:00 last changed 131 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the November, 2010 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (August, 2010):
This issue is resolved by the resolution of issue 1051.
It is not clear whether the current specification allows a defaulted copy constructor to call an explicit constructor to copy a base or member subobject, and if so, whether that is desirable or not. See also issues 535 and 1118.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: fdis -> c++11 |
| 2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> fdis |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3186 |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: tentatively ready -> dr |
| 2010-10-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> tentatively ready |
| 2010-08-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2794 |
| 2010-08-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> ready |
| 2010-01-12 00:00:00 | admin | create | |